The Rodon selection analysis from Leeds Live reporter Isaac Johnson argues Joe Rodon may face a tougher route back into Leeds United’s starting side because of James Justin’s form.
It is an opinion piece about competition in defence. It does not establish that Daniel Farke has decided to leave Rodon out when he is available again.
Rodon selection analysis centres on Justin’s form
Johnson’s case is that Justin has made the right-sided centre-back role his own during Rodon’s absence. He points to Justin’s positioning behind Jayden Bogle and his judgment about when to join attacks.
The role demands more than defending the penalty area. Justin can move beyond Bogle or support him from inside, while still being responsible for the space behind the wing-back.
The Rodon selection analysis highlights his goal against Arsenal as the most visible example, but Johnson places equal weight on the work that helps Leeds maintain their defensive shape.

Competition extends across the Leeds defence
The Rodon selection analysis also praises Nico Elvedi and Tarik Muharemovic. That wider competition matters to the argument: moving Rodon into another position would still mean making a choice about a defender already playing well.
Johnson acknowledges Rodon’s experience and leadership. Those qualities remain part of Farke’s selection picture, even if Justin’s performances make an immediate change harder to justify.
Rodon selection analysis leaves the decision with Farke
The distinction is between an available player and a guaranteed starter. Leeds can welcome Rodon back without assuming that the defence must automatically return to its earlier arrangement.
Equally, a strong run from Justin does not settle every future selection. Fitness, the opponent and the demands of the schedule can all affect the choice.
The Rodon selection analysis concludes that the level of competition has risen. The next decision belongs to Farke, and this analysis is not a fresh medical update or a confirmed return date.
Read Isaac Johnson’s Leeds Live opinion piece for the original assessment.








Comment of the Month: paid subscribers vote monthly, and the best comment wins a £20 store voucher. See the rules